Why I am Convinced that Anna Ardin is really a Liar 2020 May 22, 2020
I will be somewhat upgrading and reposting this from 2012 considering that the conventional news have actually guaranteed extremely few individuals know the detail associated with “case” against Julian Assange in Sweden. The UN performing Group ruled that Assange ought not to have now been arrested into the united kingdom to start with since there is no instance, with no investigation that is genuine. Check this out and you also shall understand why.
One other thing perhaps not commonly recognized can there be isn’t any JURY in a rape trial in Sweden which is a SECRET TEST. All the proof, every one of the witnesses, are heard in key. No public, no jury, no news. Truly the only part that is public the charging and also the verdict. There clearly was a judge and two advisers directly appointed by governmental events. And that means you never ever m xxxstreams would get to know exactly exactly how clearly the full instance is really a stitch-up. Unless you check this out.
You will find therefore numerous inconsistencies in Anna Ardin’s accusation of intimate attack against Julian Assange. Nevertheless the key question which leaps away at me personally – and which strangely We have perhaps not seen asked any place else – is it:
Why did Anna Ardin perhaps not alert Sofia Wilen?
On 16 August, Julian Assange had sex with Sofia Wilen. Sofia had become known when you look at the group that is swedish Assange when it comes to shocking red cashmere sweater she had worn within the front row of Assange’s press seminar. Anna Ardin knew Assange had been likely to have sexual intercourse with Sofia Wilen. On 17 August, Ardin texted a buddy who was simply searching for Assange:
“He’s maybe maybe not right right here. He’s planned to own intercourse aided by the cashmere woman every night, although not caused it to be. Perhaps he finally discovered time yesterday? ”
Yet Ardin later testified that simply three days earlier in the day, on 13 August, she have been intimately assaulted by Assange; an assault so serious she had been happy to take to (with great success) to ruin Julian Assange’s entire life. She had been additionally to convey that this attack included enforced non-safe sex and she ended up being concerned with HIV.
If Ardin actually believed that on 13 August Assange had forced unsafe sex she make no attempt to warn Sofia Wilen that Wilen was in danger of her life on her and this could have transmitted HIV, why did? And just why ended up being Ardin talking about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and texting about any of it to buddies, without any obvious disapproval or discouragement?
Ardin had Wilen’s contact information as well as had organised her enrollment for the press meeting. She may have warned her. But she didn’t.
Let’s fit that into a tremendously brief survey of this entire relationship that is ardin/Assange.
11 August: Assange arrives in Stockholm for the press meeting organised by a branch regarding the Social Democratic Party. Anna Ardin has provided her one sleep flat for him in which to stay as she’ll be away.
13 August: Ardin comes back early. She’s got supper with Assange plus they have consensual sex, from the day that is first of. Ardin afterwards alleges this changed into attack by surreptitious mutilation for the condom.
14 August: Anna volunteers to do something as Julian’s press assistant. She sits close to him from the dais at their press seminar. Assange satisfies Sofia Wilen here.
‘Julian desires to head to a party that is crayfish anybody have a few available seats tonight or tomorrow? #fb’
This try to locate a party that is crayfish, so Ardin organises one herself for him, in a yard outside her flat. Anna and Julian appear good together. One visitor hears Anna rib Assange that she thought “you had dumped me” as he got up from sleep early that early early early morning. Another provides to Anna that Julian can keep her flat and come stick to them. She replies: “He can stick with me personally. ”
15 August Nevertheless during the crayfish party with Julian, Anna tweets:
‘Sitting outside at 02:00 and scarcely freezing aided by the world’s coolest smartest people, it is amazing! #fb’
Julian and Anna, based on both their authorities testimonies, rest once again in similar solitary sleep, and continue doing therefore for the following day or two. Assange tells police they continue steadily to have intercourse; Anna tells police they just do not. That night, Anna and Julian get together to, and then leave together from, a supper utilizing the leadership associated with Pirate Party. They again sleep into the bed that is same.
16 August: Julian would go to have intercourse with Sofia Wilen: Ardin will not alert her of possible intimate attack. Another buddy provides Anna to take control housing Julian. Anna once more declines.
20 August: After Sofia Wilen contacts her to say she actually is focused on STD’s including HIV after non-safe sex with Julian, Anna takes her to see Anna’s buddy, other personal Democrat user, previous colleague for a passing fancy ballot in a council election, and campaigning feminist officer, Irmeli Krans. Ardin tells Wilen the police can compel Assange to just simply take an HIV test. Ardin sits in throughout Wilen’s that is unrecorded breach of procedure – police meeting. Krans makes a statement Assange that is accusing of. Wilen will not signal it.
21 August Having heard Wilen’s meeting and Krans’ statement from this, Ardin makes her very own authorities statement alleging Assange has surreptiously had non-safe sex with her eight times formerly.
Some times later on: Ardin creates a broken condom towards the authorities as proof; however a forensic assessment discovers no traces of Assange’s – or anyone else’s – DNA about it, as well as its evidently unused.
No witness has arrived ahead to express that Ardin complained of sexual attack by Assange before Wilen’s interview that is ardin-arranged Krans – and Wilen arrived ahead not to ever whine of a attack, but check into STDs. Wilen declined to signal the declaration alleging rape, that was used by Ardin’s friend Krans in Ardin’s existence.
It is simple this one of a couple of things occurred:
Ardin ended up being intimately assaulted with unsafe sex, but neglected to alert Wilen whenever she knew Assange would definitely see her in hope of intercourse.
Ardin also proceeded to host Assange, assist him, come in general general general public and personal with him, work as his press assistant, and rest in identical sleep with him, refusing duplicated proposes to accommodate him elsewhere, all after he assaulted her.
Ardin wanted intercourse with Assange – from whatever motive. She “unexpectedly” came back home early after providing him the application of her one sleep flat while she ended up being away. By her very own admission, she had sex that is consensual him, within hours of fulfilling him.
She talked about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and seems at the very least to not have been discouraging. Hearing of Wilen’s concern about HIV after unsafe sex, she took Wilen to her campaigning friend that is feminist policewoman Irmeli Krans, to be able to twist Wilen’s tale in to a sexual assault – quite easy provided Sweden’s astonishing “second-wave feminism” rape regulations. Wilen declined to signal.
During the authorities station on 20 August, Wilen texted a buddy at 14.25 “did n’t need to place any fees against JA nevertheless the authorities wished to get a handle on him. ”
At 17.26 she texted because I only wanted him to take a test” that she was “shocked when they arrested JA.
The next night at 22.22 she texted “it ended up being the authorities whom fabricated the charges”.
Ardin then comprised her story that is own of assault. As a lot of buddies knew she ended up being sex with Assange, she could perhaps maybe perhaps not claim non-consensual intercourse. Therefore she manufactured her tale to fit right in with Wilen’s issues by alleging the event regarding the condom that is torn. Nevertheless the torn condom she produced doesn’t have trace of Assange upon it. Its impractical to wear a condom and never keep a DNA trace.
No difficulty is had by me in stating that We securely believe Ardin to be a liar. On her tale to be real involves acceptance of behavior which will be, within the literal feeling, amazing.
Ardin’s tale is needless to say extremely poor, but that doesn’t matter. Firstly, you had been never ever expected to see all of this detail. Rape studies in Sweden take place completely in key. There isn’t any jury, therefore the federal government appointed judge is flanked by assessors appointed straight by governmental events. The trial will be secret, and the next thing you will hear is that he is guilty and a rapist if Assange goes to Sweden, he will disappear into jail.
Next, needless to say, no matter the data is really so poor, as in order to cry rape would be to tarnish a reputation that is man’s. Anna Ardin has succeeded in ruining a lot of the ongoing work and life of Assange. The important points for the whole tale being pathetic is unimportant.
By crying rape, politically correct viewpoint falls in behind the line it is incorrect also to consider the data. If you’re maybe not permitted to understand whom the accuser is, how could you learn that she worked with CIA-funded anti-Castro teams in Havana and Miami?
Finally, to those useful idiots whom declare that how you can test these things is with in court, I would personally state needless to say, you will be appropriate, we ought to trust their state constantly, fit-ups never happen, and we also should positively condemn the behaviour that is disgraceful of whom campaigned for the Birmingham Six.